The Supreme Court has issued a 5-4 ruling that prevents Michigan from suing to block a casino that is off-reservation. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
The principles governing gambling enterprises run by Native American tribal groups are varied and complex, counting on both federal laws and the compacts signed between states and the tribes that reside within them. This plays out in legal battles over the country, including one that had been simply settled in the highest court of the land.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled this week that Michigan cannot sue a tribe to stop the opening and operation of A indian casino, as tribal sovereign immunity overrules the state’s legal challenges. The decision was an one that is divisive as the justices were split 5-4 in support of the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Off-Reservation Casino in mind of Case
The case revolved around a casino that the Bay Mills tribe integrated 2010 about 90 miles south of its booking, which is situated on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The tribe had purchased land there with money it received as an ingredient of a settlement aided by the authorities over allegations which they had not been properly paid for land they gave up in 19th century treaties.
Since the casino was built on off-reservation land, Michigan had argued that its procedure was in violation of these state compact and without permission from the state or federal governments.