Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney
A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that would enable several casino that is new become built through the entire state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language into the ballot question he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum carries a wide range of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the concern mentions ‘promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by their state Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. In accordance with a lawsuit filed in the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the one that is only has had up difficulties with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and spiritual teams have also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come with the advertised advantages of casino expansion. Continue reading “Ny Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney”